Digital reading roomAuschwitz evidence

Research & critical source review

Auschwitz evidence

Chemical evidence, historical claims, and the limits of what each source can establish.

A separate collection from the Eichmann & Sassen archive · Reviewed 1 October 2026

01 / Revised article

Why the cyanide residue argument fails

What the measurements establish, where the comparisons fail, and which explanations remain uncertain.

Read the article →
02 / 12 arguments reviewed

Additional arguments found in the CODOH review

From delayed blue staining and assay sensitivity to roof openings, ventilation, cremation, and death records.

Read the review →
03 / Corrections & limitations

Fact-check and revision record

An explicit record of numerical corrections, strengthened sourcing, qualified conclusions, and unresolved questions.

Read the corrections →

How to read this collection. The cyanide article revises the supplied second draft. Measurements are distinguished from models and historical inferences; the companion review identifies additional arguments and the limits of each assessment. This is a source review, with no new laboratory testing.